Ok, I just found this site and although I feel like a heal for posting it I felt it might open people's eyes towards what some people see as a "catfight". This is really hardcore so be warned! I'm not sure where some companies draw the line or where the enthusist would draw the line? More so lesbianism and degrigation, but wanted you to see where some of the "female" aspects of a catfights going. Goin up or down? I know theres afew sites that involve a climax, lesbians, sex ... you name it. Infact, it seems to be an ongong trend now in the world of women catfighting. I guess this is just another one of those. For myself I'd rather watch them actually wrassle alittle. So here ya go. Again its extremly sexual and abit overboard so BE WARNED!!!!!!!!!!!!
As a catfight fetishist, the lack of actual catfighting makes the site useless to me. As a Stanley Kubrick fan, I particularly deplore its version of A Clockwork Orange.
Actually, my impression is that a site like this would count as "mainstream" in today's pornography. Any porn that is found lacking in lesbian anal dildo gang bangs would on the other hand count as "vanilla".
From this perspective, DWW's Tribgirls or Foxycombat suddenly appear as sane and clean fun in good taste. I even bet that most women would actually prefer one of those strictly fetish sites to "Catfightgangbang" if they had to make a choice.
Agree and disagree .... I thought Kubrick's version of a Clockwork Orange was a great film. Sure, lots of differences from the actual book .... its like Steven King who wasn't happy with Kubrick's version of "The Shining" who later created a television version of his own book which didn't compare to the film (I thought)
My point and what I agree is "mainstream" is plainly going for the sexual value of a selling tool. Sure, most men wouldn't buy a vid of women wrasslin in tank tops and dresses, but the second they are nude and doing the nasty to each other they'll scoff it up..... or so they(companies) think. The problem is they are focusing on the wrong aspects of a "catfight". To me that site I listed above is rape and humiliation which people turn a blind eye to when its done by women who are getting paid and allow it to happen to themselves. Still its lowering the standards to the true form and isn't catfighting at all.
Thanks for the reply and I heard they might actually be making another version of a clockwork orange. So yeah, mainstream will ruin just about anything if they get a chance!!!
Yeah, I love Kubrick's film too. The site seems to have its own re-enactment of it, with women in white overalls and black bowler hats. That's what I found deplorable.
To me, a catfight involves two women competing hand-to-hand to determine who's stronger. That site, on the other hand, involves ganging up on somebody and shoving dildos in three parts of her body. So it's a catfight site in name only.
In Sweden, we have a law dating back to the 80s that prohibits the sale of "violence pornography", a very loosely defined term. I remember that law being invoked for the first time a few months ago, against a company that was producing this sort of material and selling it in ordinary gas stations. Maybe we've finally reached a limit on what is acceptable pornography, although it's hardly going to stop anybody from downloading it over the Internet.
I got it screwed up thinking you didn't like Stanley's version. Didn't realize at the time that the site did a "re-enactment" of a clockwork orange. Only hit the site once and its alittle lame doing that. I'm sure Columbia pictures or whomever released the film wouldn't be too happy about it either!!! So I am in agreements with everything you stated!
The world could be ending, people could be poor, hungry ... still they always need their porn (LOL) Its just I distaste sites that claim to be a catfight site and in reality a porn one marketing themselves as one.
I'm the type that would rather watch chicks fighting and wrasslin as well.
